| Summary: | The owners of a building (a.b._______, b.B._______ and c.B._______) appealed against a decision of the Court of First Instance, which allowed the registration of a legal craftsman mortgage in favor of a company (e.________ Sàrl) on their property. The owners argued that the company did not prove that it actually carried out work, and that the subcontractor paid the bill. However, the Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Court of First instance, as it found that the company had provided sufficient evidence of the work performed. The documents that were supposed to prove the payment by the subcontractor were classified by the court as implausible. The appeal of the owners was rejected, and they had to pay the court costs. |