Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Entscheid/2020/172)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	Entscheid/2020/172

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Chambre des recours pénale

Kantonsgericht Entscheid Entscheid/2020/172 vom 03.03.2020 (VD)

Date:	03.03.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	The owners of a building (a.b._______, b.B._______ and c.B._______) appealed against a decision of the Court of First Instance, which allowed the registration of a legal craftsman mortgage in favor of a company (e.________ Sàrl) on their property. The owners argued that the company did not prove that it actually carried out work, and that the subcontractor paid the bill. However, the Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Court of First instance, as it found that the company had provided sufficient evidence of the work performed. The documents that were supposed to prove the payment by the subcontractor were considered by the court as not credible. The appeal of the owners was rejected, and they had to bear the court costs of the appeal proceedings.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 BGG;Art. 12 VVG;Art. 127 StPo;Art. 15 ArG;Art. 31 SVG;Art. 422 StPo;Art. 437 StPo;Art. 56 StPo;Art. 59 StPo;Art. 60 StPo;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	Droese, Basler Kommentar Zivilgesetzbuch I, Art. 1; Art. 450 ZGB, 2018

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.