E-MailWeiterleiten
LinkedInLinkedIn

Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Entscheid/2020/161)


Canton:VD
Case number:Entscheid/2020/161
Instance:Kantonsgericht
Department:Chambre des recours pénale
Kantonsgericht Entscheid Entscheid/2020/161 vom 27.02.2020 (VD)
Date:27.02.2020
Force of law:-
Summary:The owners of one building (A.B._______, B.B._______ and C.B._______) appealed the decision of the Court of First instance. This had granted a company (e.________ Sàrl) the registration of a legal craftsman mortgage on their property. The owners argued that the company did not prove that it actually carried out work and that the subcontractor paid the bill. However, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the company and upheld the original decision. The court found that the company had provided sufficient evidence of the work performed, and it considered the documents proving payment by the subcontractor to be not credible. The appeal of the owners was rejected, and they had to bear the court costs of the appeal proceedings.
Rule of Law:Art. 100 LTF;Art. 423 CPP;Art. 83 CPP;
BGE reference::-
Comment:
Droese, Basler Kommentar Zivilgesetzbuch ,6e éd., Art. 450; Art. 138 ZGB, 1900

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.