Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Entscheid/2020/156)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	Entscheid/2020/156

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Chambre des recours pénale

Kantonsgericht Entscheid Entscheid/2020/156 vom 26.02.2020 (VD)

Date:	26.02.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	The owners of a building (a.b._______, b.B._______ and c.B._______) appealed against a decision of the Court of First Instance, which allowed the registration of a legal craftsman mortgage in favor of a company (e.________ Sàrl) on their property. The owners argued that the company did not prove that it actually carried out work and that the subcontractor paid the bill. However, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the company and upheld the original decision. The court found that the company had provided sufficient evidence of the work performed, and it considered the documents proving payment by the subcontractor to be not credible. The appeal of the owners was rejected, and they had to bear the court costs of the appeal proceedings.
Rule of Law:	Art. 196 StPo;Art. 197 StPo;Art. 263 StPo;Art. 382 StPo;Art. 385 StPo;Art. 390 StPo;Art. 396 StPo;Art. 428 StPo;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.