E-MailWeiterleiten
LinkedInLinkedIn

Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Entscheid/2020/151)


Canton:VD
Case number:Entscheid/2020/151
Instance:Kantonsgericht
Department:Chambre des recours pénale
Kantonsgericht Entscheid Entscheid/2020/151 vom 27.02.2020 (VD)
Date:27.02.2020
Force of law:-
Summary:The owners of a building (A.B._______, B.B._______ and C.B._______) appealed against the decision of the Court of First Instance, which allowed the company E.________ Sàrl to register a legal craftsman mortgage on their property. The owners argued that the company did not prove that it actually carried out work and that the subcontractor paid the bill. However, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the company and upheld the original decision. The court found that the company had provided sufficient evidence of the work done. The documents that were supposed to prove the payment by the subcontractor were considered by the court as not credible. The appeal of the owners was rejected, and they had to bear the court costs of the appeal proceedings.
Rule of Law:Art. 100 LTF;Art. 221 CPP;Art. 382 CPP;Art. 385 CPP;Art. 390 CPP;Art. 396 CPP;Art. 428 CPP;Art. 82 CPP;
BGE reference::-
Comment:
-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.