E-MailWeiterleiten
LinkedInLinkedIn

Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Entscheid/2020/139)


Canton:VD
Case number:Entscheid/2020/139
Instance:Kantonsgericht
Department:Chambre des recours pénale
Kantonsgericht Entscheid Entscheid/2020/139 vom 21.02.2020 (VD)
Date:21.02.2020
Force of law:-
Summary:E.________ Sàrl sued A.B._______, B.B.________ and C.B.________ for the registration of a legal craftsman and entrepreneur mortgage on their property because they had not paid their invoice for the work performed. The court of first instance ruled in favor of E.________ Sàrl, and the defendants appealed. The Court of Appeal found the arguments of the defendants unconvincing and upheld the verdict of the court of first instance. The defendants must bear the court costs.
Rule of Law:Art. 100 LTF;Art. 212 CPP;Art. 221 CPP;Art. 222 CPP;Art. 237 CPP;Art. 385 CPP;Art. 390 CPP;Art. 396 CPP;Art. 428 CPP;Art. 89 CPP;
BGE reference::-
Comment:
Schweizer, Eugster, Basler Kommentar Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung, Art. 398 StPO, 2014

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.