| Canton: | VD |
| Case number: | Entscheid/2019/1045 |
| Instance: | Kantonsgericht |
| Department: | Chambre des recours pénale |
| Date: | 19.12.2019 |
| Force of law: | - |
| Summary: | The Chambre des recours pénale has decided on a case in which A.L.________ accused his wife B.L.________ of falsifying his signature on a transfer order. The Ministère public had initially rejected the claim, but the court decided that the investigation should continue. Doubts were expressed about the authenticity of the document, as some elements suggested that it may have been forged. The court ruled that further investigation was needed to clarify the allegations. The case was referred back to the Ministère public to continue the investigation in accordance with the considerations. |
| Rule of Law: | Art. 139 StPo;Art. 319 StPo;Art. 390 StPo;Art. 396 StPo;Art. 429 StPo;Art. 6 StPo; |
| BGE reference:: | - |
| Comment: | - |
Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.
Click here to return to the page search engine.