| Summary: | The insured was employed as a newspaper distributor at the company I.________ SA and had an accident that led to incapacity for work. After various medical examinations, it was found that he could only work in adapted activities. The IV position granted him a full disability pension from January 1, 2016. However, SUVA refused a disability pension because it believed that he could still work in an adapted activity. According to various medical opinions and court decisions, it was established that the insured should not receive a disability pension from SUVA, since his income as an invalid was higher than his income without disability. The case was finally decided, and the insured person did not receive a disability pension from SUVA. |