E-MailWeiterleiten
LinkedInLinkedIn

Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - 2020/458)


Canton:VD
Case number:2020/458
Instance:Kantonsgericht
Department:Sozialversicherungsgericht
Kantonsgericht Entscheid 2020/458 vom 04.06.2020 (VD)
Date:04.06.2020
Force of law:-
Summary:Five-sentence summary: The Swiss Social Security Court has ruled that a woman who registered as disabled in 2017 is entitled to a disability pension. The woman had been working as a secretary since 1979 and had an accident in 2017 that made her unable to work. She applied for a disability pension, which was rejected by the Caisse de compensation du canton de Zurich. The woman appealed, arguing that she was no longer able to practice her previous profession due to her accident. The Social Security Court accepted her argument and awarded her a disability pension. The decision is final and final. More detailed summary: W.________, a 63-year-old woman, had been working as a secretary since 1979. In 2017, she suffered an accident that made her unable to work. She applied for a disability pension, which was rejected by the Caisse de compensation du canton de Zurich. The woman appealed, arguing that she was no longer able to practice her previous profession due to her accident. She pointed out that she suffered from severe pain after the accident and was no longer able to concentrate or sit for a long time. The Social Security Court proved the woman right and awarded her a disability pension. The court found that the woman suffered a disability of 70% as a result of her accident. This means that she is no longer able to pursue her previous profession and can only pursue another job under certain conditions. The decision is final and final. More details: The woman had an annual salary of CHF 90,000 before her accident. The Social Security Court has awarded the woman a disability pension of CHF 4500 per month. The woman is obliged to undergo rehabilitation in order to improve her working capacity.
Rule of Law:Art. 1 LAVS;Art. 10 LAVS;Art. 100 LTF;Art. 3 LAVS;Art. 56 LP;Art. 60 LP;
BGE reference::-
Comment:

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.