| Summary: | The insured P.________ suffered an accident at work in 2018, which resulted in a disability of 60%.
P.________ applied to the IV for retraining in order to be able to pursue a new gainful employment.
The IV rejected the application, since P.________ could still be employed at 40% in his previous job.
The Federal Court overturned the decision of the IV and awarded P.________ a retraining.
The IV must reimburse P.________ the cost of retraining.
More detailed summary:
A. P.________, born in 1964, was employed as a computer scientist at the Federal Administration. In 2018, he suffered a spinal injury in an accident at work, which led to a disability of 60%. P.________ applied to the IV for retraining in order to be able to pursue a new gainful employment.
The IV rejected the application, since P.________ could still be employed at 40% in his previous job. P.________ filed a complaint with the Federal Court.
The Federal Court granted the appeal and overturned the decision of the IV. The Federal Court found that P.________ was no longer able to carry out his previous activity as a computer scientist due to his disability. The retraining is therefore necessary in order to enable P.________ a new gainful employment.
The IV must reimburse P.________ the cost of retraining. |