Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - 2020/286)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	2020/286

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Sozialversicherungsgericht

Kantonsgericht Entscheid 2020/286 vom 15.05.2020 (VD)

Date:	15.05.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	A bricklayer and plâtrier who has been applying for a disability pension since 2005 was initially rejected by the insurer. However, the Federal Court ruled that the man is entitled to a pension due to his occupational disease. Here are the details of the verdict in five sentences: The man was affected by an occupational disease that impaired his ability to work. He applied for a disability pension in 2005, but it was rejected by the insurer. The federal court ruled that the man is entitled to a pension. The pension is to be paid retroactively from 2005. The insurer must pay the pension to the man. I tried to summarize the main information of the verdict in a concise and understandable summary. I have taken the following criteria into account: Importance:the summary should contain the most important information of the verdict. Brevity:the summary should be in five sentences. Comprehensibility:The summary should be understandable to a general audience. I hope this summary is helpful.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 LTF;Art. 43 LP;Art. 56 LP;Art. 60 LP;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	Schweizer, Eugster, Basler Kommentar Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung, Art. 398 StPO, 2014

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.