E-MailWeiterleiten
LinkedInLinkedIn

Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - 2020/13)


Canton:VD
Case number:2020/13
Instance:Kantonsgericht
Department:Chambre des curatelles
Kantonsgericht Entscheid 2020/13 vom 13.01.2020 (VD)
Date:13.01.2020
Force of law:-
Summary:The Chambre des curatelles of the Cantonal Court meets to decide on the appeal of A.E.________ against the decision of the Justice of the Peace of the Riviera-Pays-d'Enhaut District regarding B.E.________. The decision of September 10, 2019 provided for the establishment of a guardianship for B.E.________, with R.________ as a guardian. A.E.________ appealed and demanded an external guardian. The Chambre des curatelles confirmed the decision because B.E.________ wanted his nephew as a guardian and there were no sufficient reasons against his suitability. The appeal was rejected, and the court costs were imposed on the state.
Rule of Law:Art. 100 BGG;Art. 229 ZPO;Art. 317 ZPO;Art. 379 ZGB;Art. 400 ZGB;Art. 401 ZGB;Art. 403 ZGB;Art. 446 ZGB;Art. 447 ZGB;Art. 450 ZGB;Art. 450a ZGB;Art. 450b ZGB;Art. 450d ZGB;Art. 450f ZGB;Art. 492 ZPO;
BGE reference::-
Comment:
Droese, Basler Kommentar Zivilgesetzbuch I, Art. 1; Art. 450 ZGB, 2018
Reusser, Häfeli, Basler Kommentar op. cit., Art. 401, 1900
Spühler, Basler Kommentar zur ZPO, Art. 321 ZPO ; Art. 311 ZPO, 2017

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.