| Canton: | VD |
| Case number: | 2020/12 |
| Instance: | Kantonsgericht |
| Department: | Sozialversicherungsgericht |
| Date: | 08.01.2020 |
| Force of law: | - |
| Summary: | The case concerns the unemployment insurance of an insured person who was classified as unable to work due to a planned trip. After the insured objected to the decision, the decision was revised, but without notifying him about it. The court ruled in favor of the insured and remitted the case to the employment services authority for a new decision. No court costs were charged, as the insured acted without a lawyer. The insured person and the employment services authority have been informed of the judgment and have the opportunity to file a complaint against it with the Federal Court. |
| Rule of Law: | Art. 100 BGG;Art. 52 SchKG;Art. 53 SchKG;Art. 56 SchKG;Art. 60 SchKG; |
| BGE reference:: | - |
| Comment: | - |
Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.
Click here to return to the page search engine.