Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - 2020/10)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	2020/10

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Sozialversicherungsgericht

Kantonsgericht Entscheid 2020/10 vom 04.06.2020 (VD)

Date:	04.06.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	An architect, who also worked as a teacher, applied for a disability pension. The Federal Social Court (BSG) rejected the application because the architect was still able to pursue a gainful employment of at least 3 hours a day. The BSG justified its decision by the fact that the architect was still able to carry out her previous activities as an architect and teacher despite her physical limitations. The BSG referred to the fact that the architect was still able to cope with complex tasks and take on responsibility. The BSG stressed that the disability pension can only be granted if the person concerned is no longer able to pursue an employment of at least 3 hours a day. Explaination: The first sentence reflects the facts of the judgment. The second sentence summarizes the decision of the BSG. The third sentence explains the reasoning of the BSG. The fourth sentence introduces another argument of the BSG. The fifth sentence summarizes the legal consequence of the judgment. Alternative Summary: An architect who also worked as a teacher did not receive a disability pension because she was still able to work for at least 3 hours a day. This summary is a little shorter and omits some details.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 LTF;Art. 16 LP;Art. 55 LP;Art. 56 LP;Art. 6 LP;Art. 60 LP;Art. 7 LP;Art. 8 LP;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.