| Canton: | VD |
| Case number: | 2019/730 |
| Instance: | Kantonsgericht |
| Department: | Chambre des curatelles |
| Date: | 15.10.2019 |
| Force of law: | - |
| Summary: | H.________ appealed against the judge of the Jura-Nord Vaudois District Court against the decision to J.________ the guardianship of his deceased father. The judge at the district court had appointed H.________ as sole curator. H.________ did not agree with this decision and appealed. The cantonal court rejected H.________'s objection. The Cantonal Court upheld the decision of the District Court, according to which H.________ is the sole curator of his deceased father. More detailed summary: On 24 May 2019, H.________ appealed against the decision of the judge of the District Court of Jura-Nord vaudois of 23 May 2019, who had appointed him as the sole curator of his late father J.________. H.________ was of the opinion that he did not have the necessary aptitude and experience for this office. He suggested that his mother should be appointed as co-curator. The Cantonal Court rejected H.________'s objection o |
| Rule of Law: | Art. 100 LTF;Art. 110 CPC;Art. 147 CPC;Art. 405 CC;Art. 450 CC;Art. 450a CC;Art. 450b CC;Art. 450d CC;Art. 450f CC; |
| BGE reference:: | - |
| Comment: | Droese, Basler Kommentar Zivilgesetzbuch I, Art. 1; Art. 450 ZGB, 2018 |
Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.
Click here to return to the page search engine.