| Canton: | VD |
| Case number: | 2019/670 |
| Instance: | Kantonsgericht |
| Department: | Chambre des curatelles |
| Date: | 09.10.2019 |
| Force of law: | - |
| Summary: | R.________, a Swiss citizen residing in [...], appealed against the decision of the Justice de paix du district dAigle of 23 May 2019. The Justice de Paix had declared R.________ incapable of judgment and appointed her an adviser. R.________ argued that she was not incapable of judgment and that assistance was not necessary. The Chambre des curatelles upheld R.________'s appeal. It annulled the decision of the Justice de Paix and revoked the appointment of counsel. More detailed summary: R.________ is a Swiss resident in [...]. It appealed against the decision of the Justice de paix du district dAigle of 23 May 2019. The Justice de Paix had declared R.________ incapable of judgment and appointed her an adviser. R.________ argued that she was not incapable of judgment and that assistance was not necessary. She stated that she was in a position to manage her affairs herself. The Ch |
| Rule of Law: | Art. 100 LTF;Art. 389 CC;Art. 390 CC;Art. 394 CC;Art. 395 CC;Art. 397 CC;Art. 405 CC;Art. 428 CC;Art. 431 CC;Art. 446 CC;Art. 447 CC;Art. 450 CC;Art. 450b CC;Art. 450c CC;Art. 450f CC;Art. 492 CPC;Art. 59 CPC;Art. 60 CPC;Art. 76 LTF; |
| BGE reference:: | - |
| Comment: | Droese, Basler Kommentar Zivilgesetzbuch I, Art. 1; Art. 450 ZGB, 2018 |
Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.
Click here to return to the page search engine.