Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - 2019/106)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	2019/106

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Chambre des curatelles

Kantonsgericht Entscheid 2019/106 vom 22.03.2019 (VD)

Date:	22.03.2019
Force of law:	-

Summary:	The judicial offices of N.________ and S.________ are arguing about the jurisdiction for guardianship over R.________. The Chamber of Guardianship Courts of the Cantonal Court decides that the judiciary of the district of N.________ has jurisdiction. This is because R.________ has his habitual residence in the district of N.________. The judiciary of the S.________ district is therefore obliged to submit the guardianship application to the judiciary of the N.________ district. The decision is final. More detailed summary: The judicial offices of N.________ and S.________ are confronted with a conflict of jurisdiction. Both offices have received the same guardianship application for R.________. R.________ is a Swiss citizen who is a minor and lives in the district of N.________. The Chamber of Guardianship Courts of the Cantonal Court decides that the judiciary of the district of N.________ has jurisdiction. This is because R.________ has his habitual residence in the district of N._______
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 BGG;Art. 23 ZGB;Art. 26 ZGB;Art. 431 ZGB;Art. 442 ZGB;Art. 444 ZGB;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.