| Canton: | VD |
| Case number: | 2019/1004 |
| Instance: | Kantonsgericht |
| Department: | Sozialversicherungsgericht |
| Date: | 29.01.2020 |
| Force of law: | - |
| Summary: | The text deals with a case before the Social Security Court concerning the question of whether the plaintiff is entitled to a disability pension or vocational retraining measures. It is established that the plaintiff suffers from various physical and psychological ailments diagnosed by various doctors. However, a multidisciplinary expertise showed that the complaints cannot be classified as invalidating and there is no restriction on the ability to work. The plaintiff denies this, arguing that the reports of his treating doctors should be considered counter-expertise. Despite medical reports submitted later, which call into question the experts' assessment, the authority's decision is maintained, since the later reports do not provide any new findings that would refute the previous assessment. |
| Rule of Law: | Art. 100 BGG;Art. 123 ZPO;Art. 18 SchKG;Art. 56 SchKG;Art. 60 SchKG;Art. 8 SchKG; |
| BGE reference:: | - |
| Comment: | - |
Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.
Click here to return to the page search engine.